BTW I notice that so fat we used ofbiz.16.11 so maybe we could continue to
follow this convention and have
ofbiz.17.12 and ofbiz.17.12-plugins
If nobody is against I'll do so in few days
Jacques
Le 30/12/2017 à 12:29, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Deepak, All,
It seems to me that
$ svn co
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/branches/release17.12
ofbiz-plugins
is maybe not the best name we could use. Because when the next branch will be
created we will have to rename. So I propose
$ svn co
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/branches/release17.12
release17.12-plugins
That's it's only a convention and users can use what they want, but better to
use a right convention from start ;)
What do you think?
Jacques
Le 28/12/2017 à 19:06, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
Added release17.12 in source repositories page at r#1819433.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com
www.hotwax.co
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Le 28/12/2017 à 18:23, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Le 28/12/2017 à 13:09, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Regarding the website:
1. do we keep the 16.11 listed there as the stable release branch
Yes, until we release 17.12
and add 17.12?
No, because 17.12 does not exist yet for users, it's only a freezed
version of the trunk (if I can say so)
But that page is not the download page, in which only official releases
are
published; the page we are talking about is the ones that lists our source
repositories, including the trunk and so we should definitely add to it
the
new branches.
Jacopo
Right, and we need to add the plugins...
Jacques
