OK OK, done :-D

Thanks for your collaboration

Jacques


Le 11/01/2018 à 09:50, Michael Brohl a écrit :
I think the (valid) point is that documentation should be written in a neutral form and not from a personal perspective. They should also not express personal opinions by single persons. If we want to express opinions at all, they should be officially decided by the community explicitly.

It feels somewhat strange that you want others to correct this instead of doing 
it yourself.

Michael


Am 11.01.18 um 09:29 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
As I said, feel free to improve. You can remove this section if you want

Jacques

Le 11/01/2018 à 07:19, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Why are you putting your opinion and referencing pros and cons of buildbot
in a documentation file? Documentation is supposed to be a source for
explaining what things are and how they work, not what you think of them!
Typing "IMO" in a documentation is really strange to me.

On Jan 9, 2018 6:20 PM, <jler...@apache.org> wrote:

Author: jleroux
Date: Tue Jan  9 15:20:58 2018
New Revision: 1820671

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1820671&view=rev
Log:
Fixes(?) MD syntax for HTML import

Modified:
     ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md
     ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html

Modified: ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/documentation/
BuildBot/BuildBot.md?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff
============================================================
==================
--- ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md (original)
+++ ofbiz/tools/documentation/BuildBot/BuildBot.md Tue Jan 9 15:20:58
2018
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ BuilbBot documentation
  OFBiz uses [BuilbBot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot) as its
Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools [used at the
ASF](https://ci.apache.org/).

  IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are
+
  ### Pros
  * Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have
to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some.
  * The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive UI.

Modified: ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/
BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html?rev=1820671&r1=1820670&r2=1820671&view=diff
============================================================
==================
--- ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html (original)
+++ ofbiz/tools/wiki-files/BuildBot/BuildBot.md.html Tue Jan 9 15:20:58
2018
@@ -29,8 +29,15 @@ under the License.
  <h1 id="builbbot-documentation">BuilbBot documentation</h1>
  <h2 id="what-is-builbbot-and-why-using-it">What is BuilbBot and why
using it?</h2>
  <p>OFBiz uses <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buildbot";>BuilbBot</a>
as its Continuous Integration (CI) tool. There are other CI tools <a href="
https://ci.apache.org/";>used at the ASF</a>.</p>
-<p>IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are ### Pros * Compared to a tool like
Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't have to use an UI, you write
scripts. This is also a cons for some. * The syntax is simple and well
documented, some prefer intuitive UI. * The infra team at the ASF provides
a kind of compiler which prevents to commits error in the shared script
(the builders are all common to the ASF)<br />
-* The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in a
very efficient way</p>
+<p>IMO the BuildBot pros and cons are</p>
+<h3 id="pros">Pros</h3>
+<ul>
+<li>Compared to a tool like Jenkins (those are the 2 I know) you don't
have to use an UI, you write scripts. This is also a cons for some.</li>
+<li>The syntax is simple and well documented, some prefer intuitive
UI.</li>
+<li>The infra team at the ASF provides a kind of compiler which prevents
to commits error in the shared script (the builders are all common to the
ASF)<br />
+</li>
+<li>The infra team, especially Gavin McDonald, is always ready to help in
a very efficient way</li>
+</ul>
  <h3 id="cons">Cons</h3>
  <ul>
  <li>You have no UI so you have to write your own scripts, some prefer UIs
to scripts.</li>







Reply via email to