+1 Taher, I also proposed to take pause and go slow on conversion.
Thanks! Rishi Solanki Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Michael Brohl <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > Regards, > Michael > > > > > Am 07.02.2018 um 10:13 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb < > [email protected]>: > > > > I propose a feature freeze on anything related to minilang. Let's just > fix > > bugs and try to slowly move out. > > > >> On Feb 7, 2018 11:36 AM, "Rishi Solanki" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Jacques, > >> As far as I remember when you raised this in past, and no proposal on > how > >> to replace it. > >> As simple map processor is used for mapping and validation, So I think > we > >> should take a pause on it and let the remaining minilang to groovy > >> complete. > >> > >> From my side having simple map processor in minilang (we could also use > >> XML) should be fine for now. And we can discuss/think/propose on the > >> alternative ways of doing the same once solution is in place and we > agree, > >> then we can decide weather to remove old way or keep it. > >> > >> I see similar approach in other projects and they keep supporting both > ways > >> to invoke validation methods for a while. > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> > >> Rishi Solanki > >> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > >> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > >> Direct: +91-9893287847 > >> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > >> www.hotwax.co > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I recently see some activity to replace the minilang by Groovy and > that's > >>> great. > >>> > >>> There is though a question I asked 2 times[1][2] without any answers. > >> It's > >>> about the Simple Map Processor Mini-Language: > >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action? > >>> pageId=50233697#Mini-LanguageGuide(Version1-Deprecated)-TheS > >>> impleMapProcessorMini-Language > >>> > >>> Shall we keep it as is or replace it, and then by what? Is there > already > >> a > >>> plan for that? I saw none I'm not wrong. > >>> > >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/z63ff7s7hgm4rb3e > >>> [2] https://s.apache.org/Nm9B > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
