I think we can safely ignore. If a problem arises we hardwire the dependency, so not a big deal at all
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 6:15 PM Girish Vasmatkar < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jacques > > It looks like every transitive dependency defined in our build.gradle to > xml-apis is getting resolved to xml-apis:2.0.2. > > +--- xom:xom:1.2.5 > > | | +--- xml-apis:xml-apis:1.3.03 -> 2.0.2 > > +--- xml-apis:xml-apis:1.3.04 -> 2.0.2 > > org.apache.xmlrpc:xmlrpc-client:3.1.3 > > | \--- org.apache.xmlrpc:xmlrpc-common:3.1.3 > > | \--- org.apache.ws.commons.util:ws-commons-util:1.0.2 > > | +--- junit:junit:3.8.1 -> 4.11 (*) > > | \--- xml-apis:xml-apis:1.0.b2 -> 2.0.2 > > Apparently, this has been occurring since earlier gradle versions as well > and no support yet. > > Does the build fail due to this? If it is just a warning, then may be we > can live with it. And if there is a hard dependency on it, then may be we > should try forcing the version as shown in the SOF link you sent. > > While I do not have any particular opinion on this, may be others can weigh > in and take a call as to what should be done. > > Best, > Girish > HotWax Systems > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:28 PM Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Le 21/09/2018 à 13:29, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > I cleared by Gradle cache, so had to reload all. > > my > > > > > > > > I stumbled upon this is in log > > > > > > Download > > https://jcenter.bintray.com/xml-apis/xml-apis/2.0.2/xml-apis-2.0.2.pom > > > POM relocation to an other version number is not fully supported in > > Gradle : xml-apis:xml-apis:2.0.2 relocated to xml-apis:xml-apis:1.0.b2. > > > Please update your dependency to directly use the correct version > > 'xml-apis:xml-apis:1.0.b2'. > > > > > > xml-apis-2.0.2 is not a dependency we define in build.gradle. > > > > > > We could use this trick > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22613596/gradle-download-dependency-error > > > > > > But should we or should we simply neglect and wait it resolves by > itself? > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > >
