+1 for backport. -- Rishi Solanki Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:56 PM Pierre Smits <pierresm...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Jacques, > > I support the suggestion made by Sharan. It should not be too difficult, > when a release has been made available (this should be part of the release > activities), to generate the 'release' related documents and hook it into > the website. Our (potential) adopters will benefit. > > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* > *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* > Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer > *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges) > since 2008* > Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:59 PM Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > At > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Draft+Documentation+Roadmap > > > > Sharan already suggested to "Backport to releases where possible" > > > > I think we should do that and not way R18 to use the AsciiDoc generation > > even if it's not complete > > > > Opinions before I get ahead? > > > > Jacques > > > > > > Le 14/11/2018 à 08:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > So start this discussion, currently our main documents in docs\asciidoc > > refer to the R17 release. But those document don't exist in R17 branch. > > > > > > I think it's not too late to backport them, but do we want to do so? > > > > > > Also I suggested to have an easy access to the documentation from the > > site documentation page. > > > > > > Do we also want to use the AsciiDoc generated documentation as we did > to > > provide an online help from the applications? > > > > > > Do we want to provide something like > > https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML? > > > > > > For me the answers to these questions is NO! We should have a sole > entry > > point for the documentation and it should be from the site documentation > > > page. It's then easy to provide links from there (using anchors going > to > > automatically generated IDs sections) > > > > > > What are your opinions? (I know I should re-read this thread > > https://markmail.org/message/35ak34fpzlyjiopt and I started...) > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > >
