+1 Thanks and Regards, *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore, M.P 452010 Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/>
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:14 PM Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Best, > -- > *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > Indore, > M.P 452010 > Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki* > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/> > Direct: +91-9893287847 > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:19 PM Pawan Verma < > pawan.ve...@hotwaxsystems.com> > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > While researching on OFBIZ-10743, I have found that currently, we are > using > > code39 to generate barcodes but there are some limitations of code39 as > it > > only able to encrypt letters from A to Z, digits from 0 to 9 and an > > additional set of special characters – “. $ % + – / *”. > > > > To enhance the support for more characters in barcode I would suggest > using > > code128 instead of code39. > > > > Below are some of the advantages of code128: > > > > 1. code128 supports all the 128 ASCII symbols. > > 2. code128 standard is more concise and space-efficient. It also > > provides its users with higher degrees of data security. > > > > > > Thank You *Pritam Kute* for suggesting code128. > > > > Everyone, Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks! > > > > -- > > Kind Regards, > > *Pawan Verma* | Technical Consultant > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > > Indore, > > M.P. 452010 > > Linkedin: *Pawan Verma < > https://www.linkedin.com/in/pawan-verma-aa1053a2/ > > >* > > >
