Below are the test cases failure list on running "cleanAll loadAll testIntegration" 1) [JUNIT (failure)] - production-run-tests.testCreateProductionRunForOrder : Assertion failed: ( NOT empty[originalOrderItemShipGrpInvRes=null]) 2) [JUNIT (failure)] - invoice-per-shipment-tests.testInvoicePerShipmentSetFalse : No inventory reservations available; cannot pack this item! [101] 3) [JUNIT (failure)] - productRentalOrder-test : Warning: no shipments created; could not find anything ready and needing to be shipped. 4) [JUNIT (failure)] - productServiceOrder-test : Warning: no shipments created; could not find anything ready and needing to be shipped. 5) [JUNIT (failure)] - configurableServiceOrder-test : Warning: no shipments created; could not find anything ready and needing to be shipped. 6) [JUNIT (failure)] - production-run-tests.testCreateProductionRunForOrder : Assertion failed: ( NOT empty[originalOrderItemShipGrpInvRes=null]) 7) [JUNIT (failure)] - invoice-per-shipment-tests.testInvoicePerShipmentSetFalse : No inventory reservations available; cannot pack this item! [101]
Are these are somehow related to message component? Looking more if data in the message component loaded or not. If found something then will come back. Best Regards, -- *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/> Direct: +91-9893287847 On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:15 PM Rishi Solanki <[email protected]> wrote: > Jacques, > I have completed my in hand items and closed the ticket - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10457 > > Nothing is pending in my knowledge also sms settings are disabled by > default. I'll check the tests in case something is not working due to > message component then I will fix that. If you have something handy to fix > then please share, I will look into it. > > I will get back on this soon. Thanks! > > Best Regards, > -- > *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > Indore, M.P 452010 > Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki* > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/> > Direct: +91-9893287847 > > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:56 PM Suraj Khurana <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks, Jacques for details and findings. >> I think this thread is now concluded. :) >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Suraj Khurana >> Technical Consultant >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:48 PM Jacques Le Roux < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Oh, rather better refer to >> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins >> > >> > So it's at >> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins/builds/769 >> and >> > the msggateway component >> > >> > We know Rishi is working on it >> > >> > Le 13/05/2019 à 06:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> > > At least I can say that it was before March 30: >> > > >> > > https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFramework?numbuilds=100 >> > > >> > > Le 13/05/2019 à 06:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> > >> Thanks Suraj, >> > >> >> > >> Unfortunately since another issue came in and it's now harder to >> > detect.: >> > >> >> > >> <<No inventory reservations available; cannot pack this item! >> [101]>> >> > >> >> > >> Have you an idea? >> > >> >> > >> Thanks >> > >> >> > >> Jacques >> > >> >> > >> Le 11/05/2019 à 13:59, Suraj Khurana a écrit : >> > >>> Hello, >> > >>> >> > >>> Done at rev #1859111 >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> Best Regards, >> > >>> Suraj Khurana >> > >>> Technical Consultant >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:24 AM Suraj Khurana < >> > [email protected]> >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> Sure Jacques, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I will get this done by the weekend. Please proceed in case of any >> > blocker >> > >>>> or urgency. I am also inclined with your thoughts. >> > >>>> Thanks in advance !! >> > >>>> >> > >>>> -- >> > >>>> Best Regards, >> > >>>> Suraj Khurana >> > >>>> Technical Consultant >> > >>>> >> > >>>> *HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd* >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:17 PM Jacques Le Roux < >> > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Hi Suraj, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Any chances? I don't mind duplicated data as I mentioned >> answering to >> > >>>>> Pierre >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Thanks >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Jacques >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Le 27/04/2019 à 15:36, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> > >>>>>> Thanks Suraj, >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Can't we avoid the duplicated data? >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Jacques >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Le 27/04/2019 à 15:17, Suraj Khurana a écrit : >> > >>>>>>> Hello team, >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I have checked and found that there is a data dependency of >> > >>>>>>> workEffortId=9000 in the test case which is available in >> > >>>>> plugins/projectmgr >> > >>>>>>> component. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> This was the main reason testIntegration was failing without >> having >> > >>>>> plugins >> > >>>>>>> component. I will take care of it and add respective dependent >> > data on >> > >>>>>>> order test data file. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I think its making sense now and we don't need to revert now. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>>> Best Regards, >> > >>>>>>> Suraj Khurana >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:14 AM Suraj Khurana < >> > >>>>> [email protected]> >> > >>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Sure Jacques, >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> I am into it today and if got nothing I will remove >> > OrderTests.groovy >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >> > >>>>>>>> Suraj Khurana >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:27 PM Jacques Le Roux < >> > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Suraj, >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> I think that, as suggested by Mathieu, in the meantime it's >> > better to >> > >>>>>>>>> remove “OrderTests.groovy” >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> Because it could hide other issues else reported by Buildbot >> > which >> > >>>>> is our >> > >>>>>>>>> last safeguard >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> Jacques >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> Le 25/04/2019 à 10:52, Pierre Smits a écrit : >> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Mathieu, >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to move this forward? >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice >> > President* >> > >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC >> Member* >> > >>>>>>>>>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer >> > >>>>>>>>>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor >> (without >> > >>>>>>>>> privileges) >> > >>>>>>>>>> since 2008* >> > >>>>>>>>>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 2:25 PM Pierre Smits < >> > >>>>> [email protected]> >> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should move the load aspects regarding tests out of >> > the >> > >>>>> test >> > >>>>>>>>>>> suite invocations altogether. >> > >>>>>>>>>>> The gradlew tasks states: >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> task testIntegration(group: ofbizServer) { >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> dependsOn 'ofbiz --test' >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> description 'Run OFBiz integration tests; You must run >> loadAll >> > >>>>> before >> > >>>>>>>>>>> running this task' >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> } >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> IMO, loading test data could be part of the loadAll task. >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice >> > President* >> > >>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC >> Member* >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer >> > >>>>>>>>>>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor >> (without >> > >>>>>>>>> privileges) >> > >>>>>>>>>>> since 2008* >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 1:56 PM Mathieu Lirzin < >> > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits <[email protected]> writes: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe there are a few more where testing individual >> > >>>>> test-suites >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and/or >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> test-cases are dependent on data loaded in other >> test-suites >> > >>>>> and/or >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> other >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> test-cases. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have the same experience. Moreover another source of >> > fragility >> > >>>>> is >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> that tests depend on other tests within a single OFBiz >> > >>>>> “test-case”, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> meaning one test can depend on the data produced by another >> > test. >> > >>>>>>>>> This >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> is acceptable for a “simple-method-test” because the order >> of >> > >>>>>>>>> execution >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> is sequential and managed by OFBiz, but this is problematic >> > for >> > >>>>> JUnit >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> tests (Groovy, Java) because the order while being >> > deterministic >> > >>>>>>>>> depends >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> on the arbitrary order imposed by the JVM. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> For example I know for a fact that “QuoteTests.groovy” is >> > >>>>> suffering >> > >>>>>>>>> from >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> that issue. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> While I don't hear/read about failing testIntegration >> (except >> > >>>>> where >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> code in >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the base is faulty, not when test-suites/cases are >> faulty), >> > I see >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> following >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> failures in test executions in OFBiz against jdk11: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test >> > component=webapp >> > >>>>>>>>> --test >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=webapptests'. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test >> > >>>>> component=accounting >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --test >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=invoicetest'. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test >> > component=order >> > >>>>>>>>> --test >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=ordertests'. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test >> > >>>>> component=product >> > >>>>>>>>> --test >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=producttests'. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have these test failing also when doing the test >> > execution >> > >>>>>>>>> against >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> jdk8? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Caveat: I recently set this up, so there may still be >> some >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> configuration >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues in the jdk11-test setup.. * >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have just tested the “ordertests” test-suite with Icedtea >> > 3.7 >> > >>>>>>>>> (jdk-8) >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and it is still failing, so it seems unrelated in that >> case. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Mathieu Lirzin >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
