On 24/01/2020 14:57, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Ah OK, It was not clear to me (and to Jacopo I guess), anyway the 1st > vote was confusing, thanks for voting again. I already done ;) > > I must say I'm mostly against because of the surplus of effort > necessary to backport to both R17 and R18 > > About R20, as Pierre Smits mentioned in Slack should we not create a > R19 before ;) If we follow the years, 2019 is now behind. > > Then we would have to backport to 3 branches, and sincerely it's more > work with Git than it was with Svn where we had scripts for that. I'd > maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297 would be done... sure > > Jacques > > Le 24/01/2020 à 14:44, Nicolas Malin a écrit : >> Finally I voted to didn't skip the R17 in contradiction with my previous >> message for the simple reason to respect the old deprecation code >> process and increase the release activity. >> >> For OFBiz integrator this change nothing because mostly use directly the >> release branch on git, so the choice must be oriented for end user and >> societies that develop some product for official release published. >> >> In the end year we would be publish the R18 and create on the same time >> the R20 >> >> Nicolas >> >> On 30/09/2019 19:08, Nicolas Malin wrote: >>> I'm agree with idea to skip the R17 and go directly to R18, >>> >>> We currently have many improvement and correction, present on R18 and >>> not R17 that are stable and fully functionnal >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> On 9/28/19 1:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> As reported by Rashi Dhagat in OFBIZ-11215 "Email password is not >>>> working" in R16, and actually nor in R17. >>>> >>>> It has been fixed in trunk and R18 with OFBIZ-4361. As mentioned >>>> there, it's hard to backport to R17 not even speaking about R16! >>>> >>>> I wonder if a case like that would not make R16 deprecated and start >>>> to release R18, skipping R17. >>>> >>>> Of course if people has the time, the nerves and the guts to backport >>>> to R17 and R16 they are welcome >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
