+1 Regards,
Gil On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:02:18PM +0100, Nicolas Malin wrote: > Hi, > > I most in favor to propose two products like : > > "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" (framework) > and > "Apache OFBiz Full 17.12.01" (framework + plugins) > > For advanced user, they would use the framework only and retrieve wanted > plugins. > > For discovery, the full version would be available and recommended. > > I don't think that publish plugins alone or each plugin alone would be > an interest for user > > Nicolas > > On 08/02/2020 11:04, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > based on various threads in this list, the time we will prepare the first > > release from the 17.12 branch is getting close and, since this is the first > > one in which the plugins are separated from the framework, there are a > > few decisions to take. > > > > Should we release two products or just one as in the past? > > Two products mean: > > "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" > > and > > "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01" > > One product mean" > > "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins) > > > > Alternatively, we could publish the two products at different times; first > > publish "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" and then later in the year > > publish "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"; if this is going to happen then we > > could have for example multiple releases of the Plugins based on the same > > release of the framework. > > > > One other option is to release independently each plugin (or the ones that > > we consider stable enough) rather than all the plugins in one file. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jacopo > > pub RSA 3072/ECF12FF4 2019-12-16 Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> > sub RSA 3072/40C9B367 2019-12-16 >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
