IMO, indexing (lucent/solr style) should be a lower level service given the dependencies in content and product. But maybe it already is?
Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org/> since 2008 (without privileges) *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:21 PM Pierre Smits <[email protected]> wrote: > Rich, Jacques, > Thanks for bringing this to the attention of the community. I guess the > reason is that in past discussions no agreement could be established on > what to do with it. Some fear it is lost forever when removed. > > re:If memory serves, Lucene is still used while indexing products and > content. > You're correct. But it is also true that the framework code works with the > plugins. > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Pierre Smits > *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org/> since > 2008 (without privileges) > > *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* > *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* > Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer > Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:48 PM Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Rishi, >> >> If memory serves, Lucene is still used while indexing products and >> content. >> >> Jacques >> >> Le 28/02/2020 à 12:37, Rishi Solanki a écrit : >> > Dear All, >> > I was checking all plugins developed with OFBiz. I see both Solr and >> > Lucene are there, may I know why we are keeping Lucene within plugins. >> > >> > As a framework we already have the Solr which resolves many functional >> > aspects on the top of Lucene library. Do we have any good reason to keep >> > the Lucene with us, as far as I remember we sample integration/indexing >> is >> > there, but not in use anywhere. >> > >> > May be we can remove Lucene if it is not in use as we are already using >> > Solr. Or may be we have good reason to keep both, one reason I could >> think >> > of is backward compatibility. Please share your thoughts on this. >> > >> > Purpose of this email is not to remove the Lucene as plugin, but wanted >> to >> > clarify why we are keeping it. >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > -- >> > Rishi Solanki >> > *CTO, Mindpath Technology* >> > cell: +91-98932-87847 >> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/> >> >>
