Hi all, I too support providing a smooth transition for users of embedded version to the standalone version, keeping in mind that Jakarta migration is important and the lucene may update solr further.
This seems like a good way to deal with it. Best regards Anshul Goyal On Mon, 10 Mar 2025, 20:52 Jacopo Cappellato, <jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also support the idea of deprecating the embedded mode of integrating > SOLR. > To address Michael's concerns of existing users, we could provide > tools, mechanisms, or guidelines to help streamline the transition > from embedded to external SOLR. > > Jacopo > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 3:47 PM Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> > wrote: > > > > Hi Deepak, > > > > I know that embedded Solr is used so that does not seem to be a valid > > solution. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Michael Brohl > > > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > > Am 10.03.25 um 07:51 schrieb Deepak Dixit: > > > We can update the Solr plugin to connect with an external Solr instance > > > instead of running it embedded. I believe no one uses Solr in embedded > mode > > > in production, > > > so it's best to treat Solr as an external system. > > > With the Solr plugin update, we can configure it to communicate with an > > > external Solr instance. > > > To make it developer-friendly, we can also provide a Gradle task to > > > download and run Solr in the development environment. > > > > > > -- > > > Deepak Dixit > > > ofbiz.apache.org > > > >
