Do you have a standards spec that can be used for reference?

--- BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> in the international email system address1 and adddress2 as storage
> does
> not allow for the complexity of other countries.
> however the service that reads the stored data, will do the
> formating.
> Since this is by country, the US freeform would be Address1,
> Address2,
> city, state, postalcode.
> 
> Chris Howe sent the following on 12/29/2007 12:11 PM:
> > Could you provide a bit more background.  My first instinct on this
> is
> > to continue the storage as is (address1, address2) in freeform and
> to
> > have services that read/transform that freeform into local
> conventions
> > rather than storing them in local conventions.      
> > 
> > --- BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >> I am enhancing the PostalAddress.
> >> there are two parts
> >> 1)postal address specified by country.
> >> This can be used to generate a screen to that country and do the
> >> layout
> >> for a mailing peice.
> >> it also specifies how to store the address information.
> >>
> >> 2)storing the address informaion.
> >> this is a free form system that lets the complete address be
> stored
> >> in
> >> the components that make up an address.
> >>
> >> the basic part is the Addressline
> >> it has then name of the address line that is freefrom, this would
> be
> >> used to show on the UI and or the mailing piece.
> >> there is a  linenumber and lineposition. The line position lets
> >> complex
> >> addresses be define as separate components.
> >> Like the BR address line
> >> Postal Area--Postal District--Postal Sector--delivery Point
> >> with is you can also specify the separator and where to to put it.
> >>
> >> there are services that read the country formation information on
> a
> >> Create and put in a map for a UI.
> >> Service that Stores the data, win the free form format.
> >>
> >> These would override most of the data currently stored in the
> >> PostalAddress entity.
> >>
> >> any input?
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to