On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
2) Also I wonder why we still have Confluence at HWM. Is there is
still a valid reason for that (Jacopo showed that Geronimo project
is using Confluence, with some success it appears) ? The point is
that Apache infra team is always tuning and updatding tools like
Jira and Confluence. Using Apache Confluence will then not only
benefit to OFBiz project but will also avoid the burden on HWM team.
This definitely needs to be done. It's been "on the agenda" for a
long time and has even been mentioned as such in board reports.
The trick is getting it done (ie getting the new confluence spaces
setup and then moving the content over).
-David
We could start by creating a request (of type "task") for the
Confluence component in the Infrastructure Jira. A good example/
template could be the following one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1082
Should (and can) we request more spaces? Or just one?
We really do need more than one space. Right now we have 4, and that
seems to be working pretty well. For lots of things the wiki is great
but for administrative docs and in an attempt to have more carefully
reviewed docs I like the idea of more private areas were only people
who have volunteered and demonstrated some interest and competence
have write access.
If that's not possible with the way the ASF confluence site is setup
then we might have a little fun figuring out how to make this work for
OFBiz...
-David
