That's a great idea - thanks!
--- On Sat, 6/21/08, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Login Management > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 5:21 PM > I agree, but I'm not sure that webtools is the place. > The common > component is a much better place. > > -David > > > On Jun 21, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > > > It would be nice to have all of the security related > UI in the > > Webtools component, then have the Party component > share those > > artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't > change, but its > > security-related screens and forms and such would be > kept in Webtools. > > > > -Adrian > > > > > > --- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> From: Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: Login Management > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM > >> Hi, > >> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP > application. > >> So I am going to use the framework alone and then > build the > >> custom > >> applications. > >> > >> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and > relative > >> groups, permissions > >> and roles. > >> > >> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is > defined by the > >> framework itself, > >> so I imagine it will work without the Party > component. > >> But I also see that the > >> > https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is > >> implemented in > >> the Party component. > >> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to > implement such > >> basic Login entity > >> management screen? > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Bruno > > > > > >
