Jacques, I also noticed this while I was reading the new feature in the Eclipse Ganymede. But its only for Java code :-).
The important feature on the image you attached is that "Now eclipse format only the edited lines instead of formating the whole java files". Anyway thanks for sharing it. -- Ashish On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last but not least : I have just discovered by chance the Eclipse Save > Actions preference. I put a tip there : > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Eclipse+Tips#EclipseTips-Setting%22SaveActions%22Preference. > I think it's worth it ! > > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> For those who have pretty big workspaces (many projects) with some plugins >> (moreover in my case, I was using 3.4 milestones from >> months, maybe straight from 3.3 it's ok) >> Actually it was not Classic that I used but the pure 3.4 SDK (ie without >> any plugins). I had problems with all other brands. You >> may >> find it from the Download Classic line, look for " Eclipse Project >> download page." >> Then I used the new P2 Update Manager, very nice. >> >> HTH >> >> Jacques >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 10:57 AM >> Subject: Re: Freemarker deprecated built-ins >> >> >> This morning, I used the classic package, added needed plugins and all >>> worked without any issues >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>> Jacopo, >>>> >>>> I got tons of issues with Eclipse 3.4 both on Windows and Linux (I used >>>> the J2EE distro i have alos dowloaded the classic one >>>> but >>>> not yet tried). I got back to 3.4M7 on Windows which is working like a >>>> charm but Mylyn (Mylyn can't be updated in 3.4M7). >>>> I suppose indeed that there is a problem with Subversion integration at >>>> large (I use Subclipse preferablyà. I quickly saw some >>>> indications in one existing workspace's log I unsuccessufully tried to >>>> load on Windows about subversion issue. I will retry >>>> later >>>> by importing projects one by one... >>>> >>>> On a fresh new Linux installation (only the OS Ubuntu 8.04 up to date so >>>> far) I was not even able to launch Eclipse 3.4 :(. I >>>> used the J2EE distro. >>>> I did not try yet on my dual boot dev machine with Ubuntu LTS 6.06 (I >>>> think I'm still using Eclipse 3.3.1 on this machine) >>>> >>>> I will let you know, how it's going. It seems that there is something >>>> wrong in this release, it was so easy to switch from M2 to >>>> M3 then M4 and finally M7... >>>> >>>> Jacqiues >>>> >>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>>> Jacques, >>>>> >>>>> are you using a plugin for SVN in Eclipse 3.4? I tried with the >>>>> "subversive" plugin but it didn't work for me (but chances are >>>>> I >>>>> did something wrong). >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>> BTW Eclipse 3.4 is out, I use it from the 3.4M2 release (August >>>>>> 2007). In my opininon it's really better than any versions >>>>>> before. Not only in term of features but also *stability* (at least >>>>>> on Windows, I did not have many issues - if any - on >>>>>> Linux >>>>>> before). >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am also using the Freemarker plugin distributed by Jboss. >>>>>>> Its working fine for me. >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just noticed that Freemarker 2.4 is not yet available >>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/freemarkerdownload.html >>>>>>>> It's not needed for the 1st builtin replacement but we should >>>>>>>> preferably >>>>>>>> use this version as explained in the link below. >>>>>>>> We may wait for 2.4 to do this one... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW there is a new Eclipse Freemarker plugin from RedHat/JBoss IDE : >>>>>>>> http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/index.html (i used the >>>>>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable link) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did it locally, but I wonder now if it's a good idea since ? >>>>>>>> exists and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ?if_exists are more readable than ?? and ! >>>>>>>>> ?exists and ?if_exists still work and and only ! is bringing some >>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>> features (mostly dealing with false also). If we don'"t do it now, >>>>>>>>> maybe in >>>>>>>>> a future we will have to do it. It's a 10 min work anyway... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think that as soon as you are used to them (I mean ?? and !) >>>>>>>>> it's not a >>>>>>>>> big deal, but please express yourself >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Vikas Mayur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vikas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think about updating all our templates following >>>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ? >>>>>>>>>>> At least the second and the third could be done automatically. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
