Looking better into OFBiz I found a functionality similar to what I was looking for in this screen: https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ordermgr/control/searchorders
here for each row in the list there is a checkbox and then there is a combo to select one action to perform on the selected items. I tryed to study it to see if a common pattern could be derived from it but I have seen that it is based on FTL only and no multi form as I was suggested. May be this is because this has been developed some time ago. Are you aware of some other parts of OfBiz where a multi form with action on selected item is? Many thanks, Bruno 2008/7/9 Anil Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes. > > Regards > Anil Patel > > > On Jul 9, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > > Anil, >> >> I think I found what you are talking about - >> >> http://developers.sun.com/portalserver/reference/techart/jsr168/ >> >> Is that correct? >> >> -Adrian >> >> Anil Patel wrote: >> >>> I did not understand how "Apache Directory" is more appropriate. >>> What I mean is, There is UI behavior improvements that can be implemented >>> in ofbiz. Significant chunk of it comes as part of Portal server >>> implementation. Like its will be lot nicer if we did "Party Profile" type >>> page in Portal. Ofbiz Portlets "which is something similar to ofbiz >>> screenlets" be lot more Portable in enterprise. Like we will be able to >>> deliver them thru any other standard compliant Portal Server. >>> Regards >>> Anil Patel >>> On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >>> >>>> An interesting idea, but it looks like it overlaps a lot of the OFBiz >>>> framework. I believe Apache Directory would be be more appropriate. >>>> >>>> -Adrian >>>> >>>> Anil Patel wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sometime back I discussed similar things with Andrew and Tim at that >>>>> time they suggested to instead integrate Portal server into Ofbiz and have >>>>> portal server manage all that. I liked it because then we are more in line >>>>> with industry standards. >>>>> Regards >>>>> Anil Patel >>>>> On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hans Bakker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> talking about preferences feature...wouldn't it be nice if the >>>>>>> screenlet >>>>>>> collapse is automatically remembered per user...... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It depends upon the screenlet. In some cases that might be unexpected >>>>>> behavior. In other words, users might expect a screenlet to be expanded >>>>>> until they collapse it. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>> >>>>> >
