On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 13:41 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > It was a misinterpretation on my side, I thought any change should go there. > Then I asked Bilgin to update. > My domineering tendency was back on this ;o) Sorry for that >
No problem Jacques. Now I know that some changes should go there, but not from this commit :) > Jacques > PS : though maybe having a trace of all changes could be easier than > sometimes poking around :p > > From: "Hans Bakker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If the upgrade does not need any other extra activities then a simple > > 'svn up', then it is not required to add it too the list..... > > Hans, thanks for the clarification. > > to make this document useful the following activities would be nice to > > list: > > > > 1. A re-load of seed data. > > 2. A file change which need additional unload/reload/convert activities > > 3. Any tables which can be deleted(dropped) because they are not used > > anymore. > > 4. Any other required activity to keep your production site operational > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 02:12 -0700, Bilgin Ibryam wrote: > >> What should go to this page? > >> Any data model change or only changes which need additional activities? > >> > >> In r688993 I added facilityId field to OrderItemShipGroup, but this change > >> doesn't require any additions tasks. Should I add this change to the > >> upgrade > >> doc? > >> > >> Bilgin > >
