David, I meant docs.ofbiz.org, the one that is hosted at hotwaxmedia (more controllable).
IMO the confluence wiki functionality is surely usefull but not strictly necessary and in OFBiz it is not as urgent as an user friendly CMS feature. For instance at http://drupal.org/handbooks they handle all the documentation, the contributed modules repository and more, without wiki, just CMS. And it looks very well !! Does the OFBIz CMS handle the contents versioning? If yes it could be enough. -Bruno 2008/8/31 David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Bruno Busco wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> the OFBiz CMS application is having more and more improvements and this is >> really good. However (as read on ML) more seems to be done. >> >> I was thinking that a using OFBiz CMS to host the www.ofbiz.org web site >> instead of Confluence would be the best way to have all contributors to >> see >> how the CMS works and where it needs to be improved. >> Probably, at this stage, this will sound a crazy idea but I would like to >> hear what you guy that know the real OFBIZ CMS actual features think about >> it. >> > > When you wrote www.ofbiz.org did you mean "ofbiz.apache.org" or " > docs.ofbiz.org"? > > If you meant ofbiz.apache.org, then we'd have to come up with something > pretty creative that not only allows for content management, but also did a > static HTML export since that's all we can do on that server. Even if we did > that we'd have to work with the ASF infra to figure out where to host an > instance of OFBiz that could be used to drive the exports for the site. > > If you meant docs.ofbiz.org then we'd have to write something that offers > sufficient wiki functionality to replace the confluence application running > there. That would certainly be done based on the OFBiz content management > stuff, but it hasn't been done yet. > > -David > >
