On Sep 29, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
I had a quick look at the PartyFinancialHistory screen, and after a
cursory review I have noticed some issues in some of the artifacts
involved (typos, bad naming for variables, non standard formatting).
By the way, I have noticed, in the screen acrion, the following
assignment:
<set field="organizationPartyId" from-scope="user" to-scope="screen"
from-field="productStoreId"/>
What is the meaning of this?
Looks like a mistake to me! I can't think of any reason to assign a
productStoreId to an organizationPartyId (ie why would you require
setting up data so that they are the same... bad idea).
My guess is that what was intended was to get the
ProductStore.ownerPartyId and assign it to the organizationPartyId, ie
that's how those things are meant to relate.
Something like:
<entity-one entity-name="ProductStore" value-name="productStore"/>
<set field="organizationPartyId" from-scope="user" to-scope="screen"
from-field="productStore.ownerPartyId"/>
Warning: I didn't review that code, just commenting based on this email.
-David
