Debugging, testing and monitoring.
My opinion is that when I use an IDE everything should work from there.


2008/10/3 Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I've always used remote debugging and it's problem free.  Out of
> curiosity, why do people run OFBiz in eclipse?  What are the benefits?
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> 2008/10/3 Sven Wesley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Yes, already been through that page.
> > And no, I'm not mixing branches.
> >
> >
> > 2008/10/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> did a google on
> >> running ofbiz in eclipse
> >>
> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Running+and+Debugging+OFBiz+in+Eclipse
> >> Note: you should not mix 4.0 and trunk
> >> have different projects.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sven Wesley wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I recently checked out the trunk (have been working with 4.0 until
> now).
> >>> Everything works fine when I'm running the system from a terminal, but
> >>> when
> >>> I try to run from inside Eclipse the ServiceDispatcher seems to fail.
> >>> I tried to scan the mailing-list after similar problems, but with no
> luck.
> >>> Anyone got a hint what I'm missing in my workspace?
> >>>
> >>> Exception: org.ofbiz.service.GenericServiceException
> >>> Message: Error running simple method [sendEmailDated] in XML file
> >>> [org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml]:  (Could
> >>> not
> >>> find SimpleMethod XML document in resource:
> >>> org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml)
> >>> ---- stack trace
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> org.ofbiz.service.GenericServiceException: Error running simple method
> >>> [sendEmailDated] in XML file
> >>> [org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml]:  (Could
> >>> not
> >>> find SimpleMethod XML document in resource:
> >>> org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml)
> >>>
> >>>
> org.ofbiz.minilang.SimpleServiceEngine.serviceInvoker(SimpleServiceEngine.java:78)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Sven
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>

Reply via email to