I was confused for a while I can see your point about code and number how about type added one for shipping the other for marketing.
David E Jones sent the following on 10/27/2008 1:08 PM: > > To me this doesn't seem like enough of a reason to change the field name. > > Did you run into some big confusion between the terms "tracking code" > and "tracking number"? In a way I don't like tracking number because > most tracking "numbers" aren't really numbers, they include alpha > letters and sometimes punctuation too. > > I must admit though that I've never run into anything like this sort of > confusion or any sort of related conflict in terms. Is there something > online somewhere that my be helpful for me, and others similarly > uniformed (if there are any)? > > -David > > > On Oct 26, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Joe Eckard wrote: > >> ShipmentPackageRouteSeg has a field called trackingCode which should >> really be trackingNumber (see: OrderItemShipGroup field >> "trackingNumber" & standard industry terminology). The field name >> "trackingCode" is used in the marketing entities and code to describe >> something completely different. >> >> I created a patch for this, and it touches quite a few files - are >> there any objections to this change? >> >> -Joe > > >
