Adam Heath wrote: > Tim Ruppert wrote: >> Didn't mean to send that message twice. As far as the ant update - that >> kinda stuff definitely bites you - any way we can get it in there so it >> doesn't cause anyone strife again later? > > I also have java 1.6 as my default, so even that keeps this bug from > surfacing. > > In any event, I have it working with the included ./ant shell script;
I lied; still has some left-overs being used from the global ant; it keeps looking in /usr/share/ant/lib. I'm going to create a fresh chroot.
