Very interesting Harmeet!
Would be nice to have a working gwt ofbiz example to download and test
locally.
Could be possible for you to open a JIRA and put there detailed instructions
and patches?

Many thanks,
Bruno

2008/12/1 Harmeet Bedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Why not use gwt to give same scope.
>
> We spent some time writing a complete UI layer on top of ofbiz in gwt to
> make ofbiz oriented towards a niche market. We changed approach as it was
> too much work to redo entire UI layer and we felt not the right approach.
> However we are still working to do same same scope as you - a UI that is
> more rich.
>
> Couple of things we learned that may apply to SWT were:
> - Java was not a very good domain language for UI making it cumbersome to
> be productive for large application
> - It is very nice to use HTML as the frame and embed rich elements
>
> We are now taking the approach of adding rich elements to existing pages
> and if necessary replacing pages in parts.
> Gwt gives rich client like things in javascript and still keep app web page
> pages
>
>
> Here is what we have started doing with dashboard - found the current
> mypage not as pretty and myportal not yet ready.
> Wanted to pretty it up.
>
> So framed mypage screenlets tags with portlets and portlets under a portal.
> Gives collapsible, drag drop etc. Still reuses all the work done (so no need
> to write complete new) as you are only framing html.
>
> our new page looks something like this:
>
> <!-- from header -->
> <script language="javascript"
> src="emforium.gwt.WidgetFactory.nocache.js"></script>
>
> <div em-type="portal" columnWidths=".4,.6">
> <div em-type="portlet" em-children-type="html" headerVisible="true"
> heading="portlet" collapsible="true" expanded="true">
> ---- screenlets go here
> </div>
> </div>
>
> As an example of what this gives see :
> http://extjs.com/examples/portal/portal.html
>
>
> The header javascript walks the entire page DOM and replaces div tags
> having em-type='rich widget' with gwt widgets. These gwt widgets could frame
> html, or be completely standalone. e.g. we are also replacing date
> selections with a gwt
>
> We could also replace entire segments. e.g replace paginated table with a
> gwt grid.
>
>
> There are a few libraries that are rich with widgets in GWT that can be
> applied. We started with gxt : http://extjs.com/products/gxt/. Some other
> good candidates are smartgwt ( http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/ ) and
> default GWT toolkit and associated google projects have some decent widgets
> too. (GWT is under apache license so compatible).
>
> It would be very nice if Ofbiz team can consider more GWT. We could provide
> code.. developer help etc. to promote this.
> We could start with creating a demo that you can see and see if you want to
> evaluate this direction more. I feel GWT + HTML is a very good choice for
> people writing java servers.
>
> GWT theoretically is just a mechanism where you write java code and that is
> generated into javascript and dom manipulation, but it is much more.
> - Strong typing in java, debugger support makes it far more productive and
> reliable to create rich applications.
> - Due to better approach applied with GWT to rich javascript/ajax/dhtml
> applications.. one can now write much more complex user interfaces. i.e.
> take a leap in rich web application capabilities. i.e. write an entire
> webpos in gwt vs. very hard and buggy to write one entirely in javascript.
> - Can retain HTML as the frame of application and gwt widgets can contain
> html. GWT and ftl templates can play together. So low barrier of entry,
> simple nature of web 1.0 is retained.
>
> Harmeet
>
>
> On 11/30/08 8:27 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
>> Getting ready to change how my SWT(not google) interfaces gets data from
>>  Ofbiz.
>>
>> Goals:
>> 1) allow the screens from ofbiz to drive the UI presentation.
>>   this allows the UI presentation to change as more data is added.
>> 2) return data as a web page so there is no need to reprogram ofbiz.
>> 3) allows the use of https for secure data transfer.
>>
>> Scope:
>> Can have a UI that is more rich. Keep ofbiz the same as it is now.
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to