-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I guess I figure anyone familiar with the code would know this.
I also find it humorous that as non specific you are in your answer you
are pointing out how I should be specific.
I was also trying to make a general statement, of policy.

applications\party\script\org\ofbiz\party\user\UserEvents.xml
has a createEmployee that does not have a Service interface
it does not show up in the services in webtools or in artifact.
it is used in the party webapps and shows up only when I do a code search.
There is a duplicate process in
applications\humanres\script\org\ofbiz\humanres\HumanResServices.xml
that does show up in the services.

My reason is I want to add some functionality and don't want to
duplicate existing work, as has been done above.
I also would like to put some energy to merge the two so they function
as one for both party and humanres.




David E Jones sent the following on 2/14/2009 11:29 AM:
> 
> On Feb 14, 2009, at 12:21 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> 
>> in reviewing the party services and minilanquage, I see that the
>> minilaquage scripts have functions that don't get put in the
>> org.ofbiz.party.party.PartyServices when you look them up in the
>> services of webtools.
>> So what would be the best way to expose the minilanguages:
>> 1) created service interfaces so they show up in the webtools under a
>> service group
>> 2) add a function in webtools to pick up these mini scripts
>> or both
> 
> This is twice in one day you've pushed me into the position of the "be
> specific police".
> 
> Could you please be more specific, perhaps some examples of such
> methods? I don't think this is a topic that can be discussed in theory,
> well at least not in these terms, the first thing being to find the
> difference between the two sets of simple-methods you are referring to.
> For example, is one set called as service and the other called as events
> (and therefore will have no service def)?
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJlyS6rP3NbaWWqE4RAqONAKDM6Al9v60qUh2GXJNZDXA0H9jCswCg0oFw
DL/Pd7O+5ftRRP2BtyqDD00=
=KTmv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to