This seems a good idea to me. And we could even has it in the current artifact info screen to speed and focus the (1st) mining
process.
I also agree that having things statically in DB is not an option, at least for
OFBiz OOTB.
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum" <[email protected]>
Harmeet Bedi wrote:
Ofbiz has the graph metadata of artifacts but navigating graph to
dynamically determine will be expensive.
It doesn't have to be. If we end up using the artifact info stuff for some kind of security administration screen, we can set up
the artifact gathering code to go only as deep as what is currently being displayed. In other words, the artifact gathering could
be more dynamic. As the user navigates farther down the graph, additional parsing is done.
This would eliminate the need to graph all artifacts in one step.
I agree with David that storing the graph in the database is a bad idea.
-Adrian
