Thanks Jacques ----- Original Message ----- From: Jacopo Cappellato-4 (via Nabble) To: Jacques Le Roux Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 2:17 PM Subject: Re: Managing the status for non serialized inventory items
yes, the code should already be in the trunk Jacopo On Sep 25, 2008, at 10:21 PM, jacques.le.roux wrote: > > Hi Jacopo, > > Sorry I did no follow closely this thread. Did you commit some > related work > ? > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > Jacopo Cappellato-3 wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:13 PM, David E Jones wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:35 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I would like to add support for the status for non serialized >>>> inventory items (right now the status is used only for serialized >>>> items). >>>> The idea is to add a new status item for "Damaged" inventory (and >>>> maybe "On Hold" for inventory under inspection); the inventory >>>> items with this status will be excluded by the inventory counting >>>> algorithm and also by the inventory reservation service. >>>> The main goal is to add the ability to keep into the warehouse non >>>> serialized inventory items but don't use them in orders etc... (at >>>> least until they are fixed), but don't just remove them from the >>>> system (as it happens when you do a manual inventory variance). >>>> >>>> What do you think? Can I go on with this? >>> >>> It's an interesting idea. Right now all damaged/held/etc inventory >>> is treated per unit, ie as serialized inventory. When returns are >>> received each item is evaluated individually and tracked that way. >>> >>> If I understand where you are coming from, this becomes a problem >>> when you receive 1000 damaged widgets and would have to create a >>> record for each one. >>> >> >> Yes, this is the exactly the scenario I have in mind. >> And maybe another one could be this: I have the suspect that the >> items >> in an inventory item could be damaged and I schedule an inspection... >> in the meantime I want to make sure the items are not reserved for >> new >> orders; so I change the status to "On Hold" until the inspection is >> done. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jacopo >> >> >>> With that in mind, perhaps this might be a good way to make the >>> management easier without any data structure change, though there >>> could be a number of code changes needed. >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Managing-the-status-for-non-serialized-inventory-items-tp17648284p19677568.html > Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > smime.p7s (6K) Download Attachment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ View message @ http://n4.nabble.com/Managing-the-status-for-non-serialized-inventory-items-tp193584p193588.html To unsubscribe from Re: Managing the status for non serialized inventory items, click here. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Managing-the-status-for-non-serialized-inventory-items-tp193584p194364.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
