This is true. To be more clear, performance would not just simply
suffer, it would become unreasonable and for larger databases the
query would take minutes or even hours to run. It is amazingly
expensive to create very wide temporary tables.
-David
On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:44 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Is the intention to remove the findParty service and if so, replace
it with what? The dynamic view that it used in that service cannot
simply be replaced with a static view entity and the findGeneric
service, well it can but performance would suffer for it.
Regards
Scott
On 5/11/2009, at 4:07 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
I will not mind _if_ Existing artifacts (ftl file and findParty
service) are not removed. This will allow me to keep using them
till we know that new artifacts match or exceed features available
in old ones.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2009/sponsors/sponsors
On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Can the community have a look at the new leads/contact/account
findlist
screens in SFA?
If this is acceptable shouldn't we replace the find/list screens in
partymgr the same way?
--
http://www.antwebsystems.com :
Quality OFBiz support for competitive rates....
