[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782350#action_12782350
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3151:
----------------------------------------
Chatree, Scott,
Yes, but what if someone prefer "null" tomorrow, etc.? Should we not avoid
redundancy which we now may lead to inconsistency?
And I'm sure one day someone whill ask the differnce between nullField and
empty...
I'd prefer to revert
> fix for using "equals" operator with null field in performFind service.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3151
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3151
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: framework
> Reporter: Chatree Srichart
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
> Attachments: FindServices.java.diff
>
>
> Because I can not use "equals" operator with null field in performFind
> service. So I fixed for use one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
