On 26/11/2009, at 12:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

From: "Scott Gray" <[email protected]>
On 26/11/2009, at 11:58 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
The reason of all these troubles is that Shark is not compiled anymore, not Workflow (this answer Adam question). Do we really need to keep them in trunk ? We may put them aside but still accessible ?

When raising discussions like this it is always better to go back and read the previous discussions on the same topic and commenting with those in mind. It is really pointless for us to keep rehashing the same issue unless anything has changed since the last time.

Actually if you have read all my message, I think a better proposition would be to remove them *also* from the JavaDoc ant target...

I did read your entire message but removing them from the javadoc build is a separate discussion to removing them from the trunk and I didn't respond to it because it had already been discussed on the r884292 thread.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to