From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
From: "Adam Heath" <[email protected]>
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Personnally, I see more harms than benefits as time goes by. I think
it's time for a vote.
+1 to remove
Not official, but +1 from me too
If we don't remove it we should at least take care of issues like the
one we just crossed with JavaDoc. Actually, I can't see any other kind
of issues, so simply commenting out JavaDoc targets in /shark/build.xml
(with a comment about like in framework/build.xml) would be sufficient
in this case.
Well, I've made it compile, which should fix basic parse issues with
javadoc.
Yes, thanks Adam, but we all know this will come over and over in the future...
If we remove it, we could attach an archive of the component at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552. And as David said
(thanks for the links Scott), we should do the same for the workflow
component which is even older...
Don't need to attach an archive. It'll exist in svn history.
Maybe it's more convenient though to have all ready in one place.
We could also create a deprecated directories and put there all deprecated
components in the future (for now workflow and shark) ?
There will be easy to reach with special directions to use but disconnected
from current work...
Jacques
Jacques
