Erwan, That sounds great. Let me know if you get stuck with anything. We are doing a lot of AJAX work right now with Dojo and OFBiz. Selenium has some problems with heavy AJAX applications. We are looking at some ways to make it easier to test AJAX applications with Selenium and Dojo's DOH test framework.
Another feature that would be nice is to create the proper XSLT script to change default selenium from their IDE to selenium XML. Then we could ask the selenium project to include this in their IDE distribution. This would make it easier to use the IDE for recording tests and then converting them to selenium XML. Thanks, Brett On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES < [email protected]> wrote: > Brett, > > the logging selenium project is under the Apache2 licence, as we see it > there : http://loggingselenium.sourceforge.net/license.html. But we have > to migrate to JUnit 4 before, as it is required by this code. > For junitreport, it is already used in OFBiz, to create the test reports > (in the main build.xml file, l445). We just have to give him a well formated > file to transform ! > > The callByReflection seems to work nice, I will look in it deeper tomorrow. > > With my colleagues, we have a CI server running selenium tests every > nights, at this address : http://selenium.neogia.org/ and an historical > view at http://selenium.neogia.org/Final.html > For the moment, it's only "pure" selenium tests, but we are willing to > migrate them to seleniumXml, and then be more in phase and integrated with > OFBiz trunk. And also give tests to the communauty. > > Cheers, > > Le 02/12/2009 20:05, Brett Palmer a écrit : > > Erwan, >> >> For SeleniumRC commands that aren't mapped to a valid SeleniumXml element >> we >> added a method called SeleniumXml.callByReflection(). If the element name >> matches exactly the SeleniumRC API call then it should be able to call the >> SeleniumRC API for assertConfirmation. >> >> You could try using that first. If you need the parameters for the API to >> be in a specific order than you need to implement the assertConfirmation >> as >> another command in the Selenium XML. >> >> Logging is a problem. I create a simple log4j implementation originally >> but >> it just uses the defaults and doesn't read any configuration files for >> log4j. Ideally it would be nice to call the ofbiz logging features (as >> well >> as other features) but this then requires that your test runs inside the >> ofbiz/tomcat container. I wanted to avoid that because of the slow load >> times to run tests. >> >> I think using one of those logging report solutions that you mentioned >> would >> be a good idea. We just need to be careful that it doesn't violate any of >> the Apache license issues. It would also be nice if the seleniumXml >> logging >> reports worked with whatever we decide to use with the OFBiz junit >> reporting. >> >> Let me know what you think. >> >> >> Brett >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES< >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Brett, >>> >>> I've been working on seleniums and tests, as you may have seen, all the >>> day. >>> I corrected one of the tests you gave to make it work, an element has got >>> his name changed. >>> >>> Index: testdef/seleniumxml/example/example_new.xml >>> =================================================================== >>> --- testdef/seleniumxml/example/example_new.xml (révision 886173) >>> +++ testdef/seleniumxml/example/example_new.xml (copie de travail) >>> @@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ >>> <waitForPageToLoad value="10000" /> >>> <click locator="link=Items" /> >>> <waitForPageToLoad value="10000" /> >>> -<type name="description" value="Item 1" /> >>> +<type name="AddExampleItem_description" value="Item 1" /> >>> <type name="amount" value="100" /> >>> <select locator="amountUomId" option="label=Weight: Stone (st)" /> >>> >>> But there is another point : in rev. 815734 (september 2009), a new >>> feature >>> was added to OFBiz, and to the AddExampleItem form. It's a confirmation >>> pop-up which appears when you click on the "add" button. >>> >>> With Selenium IDE, it's possible to manage a confirmation pop-up with the >>> assertConfirmation command, which is not yet implemented in seleniumXml. >>> >>> Last thing for today : there is no logs created by seleniumXml. Could we >>> think of something together, which could produce nice reports, like >>> logging >>> selenium<http://loggingselenium.sourceforge.net/>, or more basic like >>> JUnitReport. >>> >>> I'm waiting for your comments. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Le 01/12/2009 20:32, Brett Palmer a écrit : >>> >>> Erwan, >>> >>>> >>>> The latest update to the seleniumXml code was added to JIRA Sept. 23, >>>> 2009 >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2964 >>>> >>>> Hans Bakker committed it to the trunk in revision 819863 (Sept. 29). >>>> >>>> The duplicate libraries are probably a hold over from when the code was >>>> hosted on sourceforge as an independent project. We should remove the >>>> duplicate libraries and update the appropriate build files. >>>> >>>> You could raise a JIRA ticket and Hans can probably remove the duplicate >>>> libraries. >>>> >>>> Any improvements to the seleniumXml framework are encouraged. I think >>>> what >>>> we need now are more example test cases for existing OFBiz applications. >>>> Many of the utilities in the framework were created because of a >>>> specific >>>> testing need and I'm sure there are a lot more to add. >>>> >>>> Let me know how I can help. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> Brett >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES< >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> while looking a bit deeper to the testtools component, I found that >>>>> there >>>>> was a library duplicated and another one which is not used, and both of >>>>> them >>>>> are not declared in the .classpath file. >>>>> >>>>> json-lib-2.2.3-jdk15.jar is already present in webapp/lib >>>>> httpmime-4.0-beta1.jar os not called anywhere >>>>> >>>>> What are the steps to follow ? >>>>> >>>>> Brett, >>>>> >>>>> we (some colleagues and myself) would like to improve the seleniumXML >>>>> component. Have you made some code updates since last august ? >>>>> Have you advices to give us ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Erwan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>> Erwan >>> >>> >> > -- > Erwan >
