Hi Adam,Looking at the results my first impression is that the coverage is under-reported. For example, the accounting component has quite a few tests but no coverage is shown at all (except for the test package itself). Possibly because there is lot of logic in simple methods but I'm 100% sure java code is also run during the tests.
But still a great start and something that will be immensely useful if we can up the accuracy a bit.
Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 10/12/2009, at 2:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
I've thrown some things together this week, to implement code coverage anaylsis for ofbiz. The code itself is not tied to any particular code coverage tool(there's a plugin system for it). Currently I haveone written for cobertura, but that's gpl, so not compatible with apache.The first run I just finished had some test failures. I haven't looked to see if this is because of the coverage plugin, or some other reason. Anyways, without further ado, here is the output: http://www.brainfood.com/ofbiz-coverage/ Things to note are the entity, service, and minilang components. Those have so-so coverage. However, just about every other component has no testing whatsoever.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
