Hi Jacques,
inline
Le 11/12/2009 08:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
What about groovy scripts, are they handled by Cobertura?
From what I know Cobertura needs .class files, and for the groovy
files, it would mean to compile them first
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GROOVY/Code+Coverage+with+Cobertura
And actions in Screens, is it worth do something? I guess checking
"static structural" files like web.xml, ofbiz-component.xml files (and
all xml like them, controllers, menus, commonsScreens and such) is not
necessary?
I think this would mean a lot of work to adapt a tool to this. But if we
just stay on the services, this vould give a great overview of their
coverage.
As we are in a SOA system, and service is the most important part of the
system, we have to be sure they are tested.
For all user interface testing, validation could be done via storylines
and scenarios, with expected results after an action, as David described
in UBPL, for the user point of view.
Jacques
From: "Erwan de FERRIERES" <[email protected]>
Now the point would be to show the coverage of the simple methods and
also, maybe in sometime, the selenium coverage.
What would be great is finding a way to indicate which services are
tested, and then display it in the webtools. This won't give an
information as precise as cobertura but would add some quick display
on what is or can be tested.
If we agree on a syntax to use, I would be ready to add the screen in
OFBiz.
Cheers,
Le 11/12/2009 00:21, Scott Gray a écrit :
../..
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
