Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > a quick update on this: > > 1) all the files under applications/content/template/docbook should be fine > (they don't have a license header but they are under a compatible license) > 2) the license issue (if any) that Hans and I were discussing is only related > to the 3 files docbook.xsd, docbook.dtd, xlink.xsl and xml.xsl: they are > distributed under the GNU Free Documentation License > GNU Free Documentation License but Hans got an "ok" message from one of the > authors as mentioned in our LICENSE file: > > "It was allowed by the author to use the docbook files within the Apache > OFBiz system in an email to H.Bakker from N.Walsh dd Tue, 25 Aug 2009 > 07:27:51 -0400 (18:27 ICT)" > > Even if I suspect that we may have to take further actions for #2, I have to > say that #1 is really a good news (since that group contains a big amount of > files). >
Permission for ofbiz is not enough; what about others that distribute ofbiz, oh, like, brainfood? Ie, is this permission transitive.
