If migration from old releases to newer ones was more automated (e.g. providing db migration scripts, ensuring consistent apis between releases, etc), it would be more practical to have only one (maybe two) stable release (i.e. supported). I imagine the main reason for users wanting very old releases to be supported is because the manual upgrade process is very laborious.
Shouldn't we make is easy for uses to upgrade to the latest stable release to make it easier to phase out old releases? -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Rethinking-our-release-strategy-tp1555976p1556463.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
