Adam Heath wrote: > Adam Heath wrote: >> Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma >>> instead of cobertura ? >>> In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a >>> CPL license. >> Not super hard, no; I wrote the interface to be extensible with other >> tools. > > I'm looking at it's sample reports, and I like cobertura's better. I > don't know if it is the same data, tho. > > I'll look into adding support for it.
Actually, emma doesn't look like it's maintained anymore. Last download available was made back in 2005.
