looking forward to it! thanks for your help.

Regards,
Hans

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:39 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> I should have a fix shortly.
> 
> Jacopo
> 
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> 
> > --- On Thu, 2/25/10, Jacopo Cappellato <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> 
> > wrote:
> >> On Feb 26, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Adam
> >> Heath wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Adrian Crum wrote:
> >>>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> >>>>> On Feb 25, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Adam Heath
> >> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Adam,
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Adam
> >> Heath wrote:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> (moving to the dev list)
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Hmmm....
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> I am trying to find out more
> >> details using jmap and now I am no
> >>>>>>>>> more thinking that birt is the
> >> issue.
> >>>>>>>>> Adam, is it possible that the
> >> Webslinger component is causing this?
> >>>>>>>>> Running jmap -permstat I get
> >> the following stats:
> >>>>>>>> Not the component, no.  What
> >> you see below is a consequence of the
> >>>>>>>> custom classes that get compiled
> >> for every single service engine
> >>>>>>>> definition, so that you can see
> >> what file/line the service is
> >>>>>>>> defined in.
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> sorry for the silly question: are you
> >> saying that the custom classes
> >>>>>>> are not compiled by some code in
> >> Webslinger? I really don't know
> >>>>>>> where to look for AsmUtil and
> >> GeneratedClassLoader.
> >>>>>> I never said any such thing.  I'm
> >> just saying that we may need more
> >>>>>> permgen space, as that is where classes
> >> are loaded.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Is there a way to temporarily disable this
> >> GeneratedClassLoader thing?
> >>>>> Could you point me to the right direction for
> >> fixing this issue
> >>>>> (without the hack of increasing the PermGen
> >> memory)? I could not even
> >>>>> find the AsmUtil class...
> >>>> 
> >>>> Jacopo, it looks like the code you are wanting to
> >> work on is contained
> >>>> in the webslinger jar files. We don't have access
> >> to the source code.
> >>> 
> >>> Yes, this is true, but the interface to that is in the
> >> service engine,
> >>> so you could modify ModelServiceReader, as I suggested
> >> previously.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Ok, thanks guys, I'll have a look at this.
> > 
> > Good luck! I looked at it and gave up. ;-)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
-- 
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates

Reply via email to