Tim Ruppert wrote: > You have seen the email from Jacopo telling you why this can and should be > revered. If you'd like me to resend that again, I can do it - but this > commit has been turned down by many other committers - not just me, Hans. I > have also modeled the appropriate behavior here on the Service Providers Page > - that's the right place to point to your home page or your twitter feed - > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/jwBk - or really I would say it could > just be on your own marketing material, but I was trying to compromise here. > > Please don't get into a commit war - we've discussed this one to death and it > was time to revert it. This isn't about legal at this point - we have a > place for this kind of thing and you having a twitter feed is not news - > especially when the link is completely obfuscated to make it seem like it's a > project resource. > > Again, as I've said in this commit message and on this list like a thousand > times - once the PMC decides we need a twitter feed AND all committers are > provided with the credentials AND we update the Bio and information to show > that this is not a certain companies, but being done by all of us, then I for > one and in favor of putting this back the original way you envisioned. This > has been echoed as something that many other PMC members and committers want > to have happen - is this something that you are not in favor of any longer > (that is following thru on the process of getting buy in)? > > OFBiz having an official sanctioned Twitter feed IS news - can't wait until > we get to that point - if that's what gets decided.
We don't need a twitter feed. We already have a 'notification' system of things that change/happen in ofbiz. It's called this list.
