I would happy to wait an extra few minutes of compile to save a few hours of manual javascript development ;)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [email protected]> wrote: > From: "Wickersheimer Jeremy" <[email protected]> > > Yes we only compile for one browser and one locale. >> >> Also there are various modules and only the modified modules are rebuilt >> although when working on the common module this still triggers the >> rebuilding of all the depending modules. >> >> This is obviously slower than modifying the js code in-line in your page >> of course, but a typical rebuild cycle in development is just a few minutes. >> > > Great, but mmm... few minutes is much... > > Jacques > > > -- >> Wickersheimer Jeremy >> On Friday 12 March 2010 00:06:22 chris snow wrote: >> >>> >From the GWT FAQ >>> >>> >>> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/1.6/FAQ_DebuggingAndCompiling.html#Ca >>> n_I_speed_up_the_GWT_compiler ?: >>> >>> If you are compiling a large application, you may find that compiling to >>> web mode takes a long time. One issue is that the compiler actually >>> builds >>> several versions of your application based on client properties for >>> locale >>> and browser. For deployment, this is crucial, but for everyday >>> development, you are probably only using a single browser and locale. If >>> that is the case, then you can take a shortcut and compile only a single >>> permutation during the development cycle. >>> >>> I don't know if OpenTaps are doing this development optimisation. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Tim Ruppert >>> >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> > The compilation steps, the model of usage, the weight it put on the >>> > system, etc, etc - in fact I can only say that I don't think it's very >>> > usage for anyone - although it does have some pretty slick tools. We >>> > use prototype and the tools around - but we've got people who throw >>> that >>> > stuff around pretty easily. I would prefer not to be forced into going >>> > the GWT route - so what I was saying, is let's keep it out of regular >>> > usage for as long as possible. >>> > > Cheers, >>> > Ruppert >>> > -- >>> > Tim Ruppert >>> > HotWax Media >>> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> > > o:801.649.6594 >>> > f:801.649.6595 >>> > > On Mar 10, 2010, at 4:13 PM, chris snow wrote: >>> > > Hi Tim, >>> > > > > Just out of interest, which bits suck with GWT - developing, or >>> end >>> > > user usability? >>> > > > > One reason that got me interested in using GWT with ofbiz is the >>> amount >>> > > of >>> > > > time that it took to add some interactivity to some of my ftl pages >>> > > using prototype. (I have some previous experience with jQuery, but >>> > > not with prototype, so learning curve was a moderately big part of my >>> > > pain). >>> > > > > Cheers, >>> > > > > Chris >>> > > -- >>> > > > View this message in context: >>> > >>> http://n4.nabble.com/OFBiz-GWT-Projects-for-bulding-user-interface-with-G >>> > WT-tp1570621p1588195.html >>> > > > Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> >
