Come on people, please stop pushing this. There are only two possible outcomes that I can see, and I don't like either of them:
1. the PMC has to vote on EVERY change to the home page, especially in the news section, to make sure everyone agrees that it is "news" 2. we remove the news section, and anything else that might change regularly, from the home page Do we really have to resort to the most restrictive measures possible? Can't we get along with something less? Either way, I've pulled my stuff from the page and I'm out of this conversation. Have fun. -David On Mar 17, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Sharan-F wrote: > > Hi David > > If that's what the community wants then thats OK with me but I think we need > to define what 'news' is. For example is the book by Packt publishing > classed as news or promotional material? (To me its news but it also > promotes Packt) > > I think if there can be any ambiguity then we need something the say what is > acceptable and what is not. If Tim has this covered then great but I'd still > think it would be good to have something written somewhere so we're all > clear on what's what. > > Thanks > Sharan
