On 19/03/2010, at 5:01 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: >> I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me. > > Where is that code then? Why isn't it committed?
All I did was turn off the inventory requirement during the condition checking, it was not a generic solution that would have incorporated both strategies. > >> On 19/03/2010, at 4:45 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> >>> Why does GWP require inventory? Shouldn't that be a flag on the >>> action itself? Our client wants to always give the gift, and have a >>> backorder sub-process be initiated. >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
