Scott Gray wrote: > On 23/03/2010, at 9:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> This seems important, could you explain how it works a little more? >> There was a thread about this recently, where I announced which >> classes had full coverage. This annotation just means that the >> person(s) listed in the annotation are monitoring the source. That >> means that those people might be who to turn too if there are >> questions on how the code works. > > But what does it do functionally? How would it be different from: > // "Don't mess up my code buddy!" signed Adam Heath
Shows up in javadoc. The retention policy could be changed to to Runtime, so that a test case that fails could report something automatically. Remember, annotations are easier to access programatically.
