On 26/03/2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > The above method makes use of a BigDecimal. This is wrong. It should > be an int. Originally, before the BigDecimal conversion, it was a > Double. This method should have never been converted.
It looked like a good candidate at the time and looking at it now, it still looks like a good candidate for BigDecimal. Why should it never have been converted?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
