BJ Freeman wrote: > once coded to do all that is not going to be hard. > it would run up the cpu usage and database activity but on a dedicated > server that should not be a problem. > > Plus I think it is good for audit to keep all the records synced to the > current lognin
My recommendation wouldn't require that. The username used to log in with would not be tied to the userLoginId field, so there wouldn't be a need to change any other fields.
