On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Bob Morley wrote:
Here is my question -- when looking at the reports it showed 100%
line code
coverage in UtilValidate (for example) but this was for 111 lines.
Clearly
this class has many more lines than that, and when I opened it up I
saw that
large portions of it were not marked green or red in the report.
What
gives? :)
Coverage in framework/base sucks when running run-tests at the
top-level. There are overlapping classloaders, and this confuses
cobertura.
Running component tests directly in framework/base, doing 'ant tests'
does give correct coverage metrics.
Does this only apply to framework/base? When I looked at coverage of
UtilAccounting (for example) it looks pretty accurate.
Also, we were talking in the office -- our understanding is that the
Cobertura license would restrict Ofbiz from redistribution, but it
should be able to use it as part of their build process. Do you think
there would be an issue include a target that downloads and deploys
Cobertura and executes those targets as part of our build process
internally? That way we could get these metrics published as we move
forward. (Naturally we would have to fix the issue referred to
above. Thoughts?
