Scott Gray-2 wrote: > > OFBiz follows the textXXX method names because it has to for JUnit to work > (at least for the version we have). Renaming the Class just seems like a > pain especially when a plural makes more sense. Are you sure Clover isn't > configurable in this regard? >
There is "Advanced Test Case Detection" that is typically used if you are using a framework other than JUnit 3.x, 4.x, or TestNG. I could certain use that in my development environment and avoid the renames. My line of thinking goes something like ... if there is a broadly accepted standard we should probably just adhere to it unless there is significant reason not to. PROS: Adheres to broadly accepted naming convention, allows IDE tooling to pickup without additional configuration. CONS: I suspect we lose SVN history, involves some work, if we upgrade to JUnit 4.x and use annotations there is less of a need (but I still think the naming conventions are a good thing). -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Renaming-of-java-junit-tests-tp1755800p1755899.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
