Thanks for sharing, but what is the relevance? Regards Scott
On 8/04/2010, at 1:21 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > An OFbiz feature - you can override service definitions. > > -Adrian > > --- On Wed, 4/7/10, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Subject: svn commit: r931787 - >> /ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 10:52 PM >> Author: lektran >> Date: Thu Apr 8 05:52:37 2010 >> New Revision: 931787 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931787&view=rev >> Log: >> Service definition was pointing to the wrong implementation >> location, strange that they're in different components >> >> Modified: >> >> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml >> >> Modified: >> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml?rev=931787&r1=931786&r2=931787&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- >> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml >> (original) >> +++ >> ofbiz/trunk/applications/securityext/servicedef/services.xml >> Thu Apr 8 05:52:37 2010 >> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ under the License. >> >> <!-- permission check --> >> <service >> name="securityPermissionCheck" engine="simple" >> - >> >> location="component://securityext/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml" >> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck"> >> + >> >> location="component://common/script/org/ofbiz/common/permission/CommonPermissionServices.xml" >> invoke="genericBasePermissionCheck"> >> <implements >> service="permissionInterface"/> >> <attribute >> name="primaryPermission" type="String" mode="IN" >> optional="true" default-value="SECURITY"/> >> </service> >> >> >> > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
