Scott Gray-2 wrote: > > The first thing I would suggest doing is searching for previous > discussions in the mailing list archives, I can't help but feel that the > uom topic has been discussed at least a million times (maybe more). >
Duh I violated the first principle! I will refer myself to http://n4.nabble.com/New-field-to-specify-the-internal-uom-of-products-td171281.html#a171281. Thanks ;) -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/InventoryItem-QOH-ATP-missing-Unit-of-Measure-tp1777324p1781270.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
