+1. -- Ashish
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Raj Saini <[email protected]> wrote: > In my opinion run-install is misleading as it really does not tell that it > is going to install demo data and cause confusion to new users as it has > happened with me in the past. For the benefit of old and new users, I > suggest to add new command run-install-demo and leave the run-install as it > is for a while and document them to tell what exactly they do. There are > numerous examples of this in the Linux/Unix world. > > Thanks, > > Raj > > On 21/04/10 09:39, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >> On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:15 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> This is just *your* opinion and I respect it (even if comparing this to >>>> altering an api is ridiculous)... but please quit with the "teacher/guru" >>>> mode... >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Why is it ridiculous to think of shell script parameters as an API? You >>> would surely be surprised if "ls" became "rm" one day, as an extreme but >>> valid example. >>> >> >> As a new user of the "OFBiz Linux OS" I would be also very surprised if >> the "rm" command really was a "rm -r" command; in my opinion this is worth >> of a change, even if old users would have to read one line of documentation >> to learn the change. >> But really, it is not very important, I am more than happy to leave things >> as is because I understand that this could be annoying for old users and >> frankly speaking I don't have time and energy to further discuss this. >> >> Jacopo >> >> >>> >>> I think we can safely regard shell scripts as a class of >>> program. >>> >>> Regarding "run-install", we've set an expectation that run-install will >>> give you a demo system and that could throw people off. Changing it >>> doesn't seem hazardous but I'm not clear that it adds value. >>> >>> -- >>> Ean Schuessler, CTO >>> [email protected] >>> 214-720-0700 x 315 >>> Brainfood, Inc. >>> http://www.brainfood.com >>> >>> >> >> > >
