Adrian Crum-2 wrote: > > In the meantime, I'm working on a date/time library that includes an > ElapsedTime class (an improved TimeDuration class) that follows Martin > Fowler's Quantity pattern. >
I am certainly not interested in re-inventing the wheel here. I know in our solution we are going to allow entry against a ProductionRun task in hours and I will want to leverage this TimeDuration as you have in WorkEffortServices. Way back in 2006 - 2007 there was talk of including Joda time into Ofbiz (at the time the thread dealt with wrapping up time related functionality in minilang). Do you know why we decided to back-off Joda time (if there was a conscious decision there)? My understanding is that JSR 310 (new java date/time apis) that has been proposed for Java 7 is largely based on Joda time. Being that the lic. is favorable, I would have thought pulling in and using their Duration might make sense vs. maintaining our own TimeDuration and/or a new date/time library? Very interested in your thoughts because this really appears to be something in your wheel house. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Regarding-SVN-commit-r892904-tp2018084p2019014.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
